Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 72
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. N.S. International, Ltd., et al
as 16-2086
: In re: OCCUPANT SAFETY SYSTEMS
Plaintiff - Appellee: END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant: OLEN YORK
Defendant - Appellee: N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC., LEAR CORPORATION and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2058
: In re: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant: BENJAMIN FEURY and THOMAS SARRIS
Defendant - Appellee: NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
End-Payor Plaintiffs, et al v. Nippon Seiki Company, Ltd., et al
as 16-2025
: In re: AUTOMOTIVE PARTS ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff - Appellee: END-PAYOR PLAINTIFFS
Interested Party - Appellant: OIEN YORK, AMY YORK and NANCY YORK
Defendant - Appellee: NIPPON SEIKI COMPANY, LTD., N.S. INTERNATIONAL, LTD., NEW SABINA INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Russell v. Nissan Motor Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv00458
Defendant: Autoliv Electronics Asia Pacific, Autoliv Japan Ltd, Ken Garff Automotive Group and others
Plaintiff: Morgan Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Occupant Safety Systems - Heavy Equipment Trucks
as 2:2015cv00607
Plaintiff: Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. , TRW Deutschland Holdings Gmbh, Takata Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. et al v. UBS AG et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv05844
Defendant: UBS AG, UBS Securities Japan Co., Ltd., Mizuho Bank, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff: Sonterra Capital Master Fund Ltd. and Hayman Capital Management L.P.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc. et al v. TRW Automotive Holdings Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv12050
Plaintiff: Rush Truck Centers of Arizona, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of California, Inc. , Rush Truck Centers of Colorado, Inc. and others
Defendant: TRW Automotive Holdings Corp., TRW Deutschland Holdings Gmbh, Takata Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Andrews et al v. Autoliv Japan, Ltd. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv03432
Special Master: Michael A. Sullivan
Plaintiff: Jamie Lee Andrews
Defendant: Mazda Motor Corporation, Mazda Motor of America, Inc., Autoliv, Inc. and others
Petitioner: Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Motor Vehicle
Nipponkoa Insurance Co Ltd et al v. UPS Supply Chain Solutions Inc et al
as 2:2014cv07301
Defendant: Does, UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd and UPS Supply Chain Solutions Inc
Plaintiff: Nipponkoa Insurance Co Ltd and Sompo Japan Nipponkoa Insurance Inc
ThirdParty Defendant: ROES, Shipco Transport (Japan) Ltd. and Shipco Transport, Inc.
ThirdParty Plaintiff: UPS Asia Group Pte Ltd and UPS Supply Chain Solutions Inc
Cargotec OYJ v. MOL Ship Management, Co., Ltd.
as 14-1571
Plaintiff - Appellee: POTENCIANO L. AGGARAO, JR.
Defendant - Appellant: CARGOTEC USA INCORPORATED, trading as Cargotec USA, a corporate fictitious name, CARGOTEC OYG, a Finnish public limited company, CARGOTEC SWEDEN, A.B., f/k/a MacGregor Group AB, a wholly owned subsidiary of Cargotec OYJ and others
Defendant: CARGOTEC SWITZERLAND S.A., trading as Cargotec, a U.S. Registered Trademark (wordmark), MACGREGOR-NAVIRE INTERNATIONAL AB (SWEDEN), trading as MacGregor-Navire, a U.S. Registered Trademark (service mark), MACGREGOR-NAVIRE INTERNATIONAL AKTIEBOLAG JOINT STOCK COMPANY, trading as MacGregor-Navire, a U.S. Registered Trademark (wordmark) and others
Third Party Plaintiff: WORLD CAR CARRIERS, INCORPORATED
Third Party Defendant: MOL SHIP MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LTD. and NISSAN MOTOR CAR CARRIER COMPANY, LTD.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?