Cases 11 - 20 of 24
DINAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv01615
Petitioner:
JAYME DAVID DINAN
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOUSSETT v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. et al
as 2:2015cv06318
Plaintiff:
JAYME JOUSSETT
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. , BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING, LP , ROUNDPOINT LOAN SERVICING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARCLAY v. GARDNER
as 2:2015cv00362
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL BARCLAY
Defendant:
JAYME GARDNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SCHEIB v. BUTCHER et al
as 2:2014cv01247
Plaintiff:
CAROLE L. SCHEIB
Defendant:
JAYME L. BUTCHER and REED SMITH, LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ANDREWS v. HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2014cv04337
Plaintiff:
NYESHA VICTORIA ANDREWS
Defendant:
HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA , UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM , THE TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BOYINGTON v. PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC
as 3:2014cv00090
Plaintiff:
ERIC BOYINGTON, MARY BETH GARNER, JOHN HUBBS and others
Defendant:
PERCHERON FIELD SERVICES, LLC and SALLY GRIFFITH CIMINI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
FREEMAN v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, HOLMESBURG PRISON et al
as 2:2013cv00148
Plaintiff:
JAYMES FREEMAN
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, HOLMESBURG PRISON, CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
DOBBINS et al v. OCEAN REEFER SERVICES, LTD. et al
as 2:2011cv01655
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DOBBINS and JAYME DOBBINS
Defendant:
OCEAN REEFER SERVICES, LTD. and MAESTRO SHIPPING, S.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOCKE v. BEECHER
as 3:2011cv00041
Plaintiff:
JAYME LOCKE
Defendant:
JANET BEECHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
