Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Rochester v. Sanford et al
as 3:2011cv00471
Defendant:
Abston, Nikkie Haley, Eric Holder and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E. Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Assa'ad-Faltas v. Wilson et al
as 3:2011cv00278
Plaintiff:
Marie Assa'ad-Faltas
Defendant:
Alan Wilson, Glenn McConnell and Jean H Toal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fieger v. Supreme Court of South Carolina et al
as 3:2010cv01038
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey N Fieger
Defendant:
Supreme Court of South Carolina, Jean H Toal and John W Kittredge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Julian Rochester v. State of South Carolina
as 10-6050
Petitioner - Appellant:
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, RICHLAND COUNTY JUDICIAL CENTER, JEAN H. TOAL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv03148
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Gary Wise v. US
as 09-7839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GARY L. WISE, a/k/a Gary Legrande Wise
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., individually and in their official capacities, KAYE G. HEARN, Chief Judge, KENNETH A. RICHSTAD, Clerk and others
Defendant - None:
ANGELA BROWN, DHO Captain, A. GOODEN, Officer and KENNETH SHARP
Rochester v. Rosemond et al
as 2:2009cv01809
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Defendant:
E Delane Rosemond, Mark Sanford, United States Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Clemons v. Bradley et al
as 6:2007cv03286
Plaintiff:
Clayton Clemons
Defendant:
J N Bradley, Chris Scalzo, C R Garrett and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Henry McMaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burts v. Greenville Clerk of Court et al
as 8:2007cv03011
Plaintiff:
Antonio Burts
Defendant:
Greenville Clerk of Court, Solicitors Office, Dorothy A Manigault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
