Cases 11 - 20 of 59
Paige #211567 v. Washington
as 1:2020cv00629
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Paige #211567
Defendant:
Heidi Washington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv00553
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Tasha Griffen, David A Ryles and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kedrick Darrough, Sr. v. James Beasley, et al
as 20-1989
Defendant / Appellee:
Phillip Suell, Lieutenant, Tucker Unit, ADC, James Beasley, Corporal, Tucker Unit, ADC and Dennis Coleman, Corporal, Tucker Unit, ADC (Originally named Dewayne Coleman)
Defendant:
Rodney Ford, Major, Tucker Unit, ADC, Jeremy Williams, Sergeant, Tucker Unit, ADC, Wendy Kelley, Former Director, Arkansas Department of Correction and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kedrick Trevon Darrough, Sr.
Kevin Jones v. Romona Huff, et al
as 19-3014
Defendant / Appellee:
Ron Bailey, Captain, Tucker Unit, ADC, Guy Michael Henry, Doctor (Originally named as Henery), Joe Paige, Warden, Tucker Unit, ADC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin D. Jones
Darrough v. Beasley et al
as 5:2019cv00144
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Joe Paige, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Kedrick Trevon Darrough, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Huff et al
as 5:2018cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kevin D Jones
Defendant:
Romona Huff, Joe Paige, Ron Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evers v. Kelly et al
as 5:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
Larry J Evers, Jr
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, Timothy Falloon, Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Billy Joe Paige
as 16-1859
Movant:
In re: BILLY JOE PAIGE
Respondent:
THOMAS M. BIRKETT, Warden
Wilbert Johnson v. Joe Paige, et al
as 15-3722
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wilbert Lezell Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Joe Paige, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, Raylina Ramsey, Classification Officer, Grimes Unit, ADC, Aundrea Weekly, Warden.Grimes Unit, ADC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
