Cases 11 - 20 of 29
De Gomez v. Adams County et al
as 1:2020cv01824
Defendant:
Wellpath, John Jane Doe, Cory A Wills and others
Plaintiff:
Celia Gonzalez de Gomez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seale v. Peacock
as 1:2019cv03559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Seale
Defendant:
John Jane Doe and Gary Peacock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PopSockets LLC v. Outlook FBA Corp. et al
as 1:2019cv01394
Defendant:
Outlook FBA Corp., John (6) Doe, Avi Sakkal and others
Plaintiff:
PopSockets LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PopSockets LLC v. Handler et al
as 1:2019cv01399
Defendant:
John (10) Doe, Sara Handler, BMG Grad Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
PopSockets LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
PopSockets LLC v. Online King LLC
as 1:2019cv01277
Plaintiff:
PopSockets LLC
Defendant:
John (1) Doe, John (8) Doe, John (7) Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
L.B. Doe 1 et al v. United States Olympic Committee et al
as 1:2019cv00737
Plaintiff:
Jane A.C. Doe 27, Jane I.B. Doe 11, Jane D.C. Doe 25 and others
Defendant:
Angela M. Ruggiero, William C. Marlot, James M. Benson and others
Cause Of Action: 36 U.S.C. § 220501
Dhameja v. PTS of America, LLC
as 1:2018cv01661
Defendant:
PTS of America, LLC DBA Prisoner Transportation Services, John/Jane Does 1-20, PTS of America, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Rajkumar Dhameja
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maples v. Doe et al
as 1:2018cv00513
Plaintiff:
Ryan Maples
Defendant:
John (1) Doe, John (2) Doe and John (3) Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhaisen et al v. John & Jane Does 1 through 100
as 1:2017cv01575
Plaintiff:
Jihad Muhaisen and Muhaisen & Muhaisen, LLC
Defendant:
John & Jane Does 1 through 100
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
September Productions, Inc. v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv02828
Plaintiff:
September Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
John (1) Doe, John (2) Doe, John (3) Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
