Cases 11 - 20 of 45
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00485
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
FLAHERTY v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY
as 2:2020cv01491
Plaintiff:
JULIE FLAHERTY and JULIANN FLAHERTY
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY as owner and operator of JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER-SC d/b/a KANE SCOTT CENTER, a skilled nursing facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Athenahealth, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10033
Defendant:
Brandon H. Hull, Athenahealth, Inc., AMY ABERNETHY and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Crawford
BUFFALO GROVE POLICE PENSION FUND v. DIEFENDERFER et al
as 2:2019cv00062
Defendant:
JANE J THOMPSON, WILLIAM M DIEFENDERFER, III, SOMSAK CHIVAVIBAL and others
Nominal Defendant:
NAVIENT CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BUFFALO GROVE POLICE PENSION FUND
Kent v. Athenahealth, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02035
Plaintiff:
Michael Kent
Defendant:
Brandon H. Hull, Athenahealth, Inc., Amy Abernethy and others
HAMILTON v. ATHENAHEALTH, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv12602
Defendant:
ATHENAHEALTH, INC., VERITAS CAPITAL FUND MANAGEMENT, L.L.C., BRANDON HULL and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HAMILTON
STRAWINS v. JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER - MCKEESPORT et al
as 2:2018cv01010
Defendant:
THE COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY and JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTER - MCKEESPORT
Plaintiff:
MARY JEAN STRAWINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DALKE v. JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTERS - SCOTT TOWNSHIP
as 2:2018cv00242
Plaintiff:
DONNA M. DALKE
Defendant:
JOHN J. KANE REGIONAL CENTERS - SCOTT TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re Attorney Disciplinary Proceedings
as 1:2016mc91349
Movant:
Robert M. Farrell
Respondent:
John J. Kane
Cause Of Action: Referral from BK Court - Attorney Discipline
John R. Kane v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
as 2:2015cv01468
Plaintiff:
John R Kane
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
