Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Shebitz v. Lebovitz et al. (JRG3)
as 1:2019cv00213
Defendant:
Stephen D. Lebovitz, Gary J. Nay, John D. Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Henry Shebitz
Gomez v. Brommer
as 2:2019cv02370
Plaintiff:
Inocencio Gomez
Defendant:
John D. Brommer
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
United States of America v. Byrge
as 3:2018cv00130
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
John D. Byrge
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402
Hughes v. Consolidated Staffing, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02383
Plaintiff:
John D Hughes
Defendant:
Consolidated Staffing, Inc. and Advance Professional Resources, Inc.
Miscellaneou:
Donna Russell
Counter_claimant:
Consolidated Staffing, Inc. and Advance Professional Resources, Inc.
Counter_defendant:
John D Hughes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Zaborny v. Hininger et al
as 3:2016cv03169
Plaintiff:
David Zaborny
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger , David M. Garfinkle , Todd J. Mullenger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jackson v. Hininger et al
as 3:2016cv03040
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Jackson
Defendant:
Damon T. Hininger , David M. Garfinkle , Todd J. Mullenger and others
Consol_plaintiff:
David Zaborny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC v. James (JRG1)
as 3:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
Total Transportation of Mississippi, LLC
Defendant:
John D. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00500
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stiles v. Erickson et al
as 2:2015cv02553
Plaintiff:
Dorinda J Stiles
Defendant:
John D. Erickson and Fidelity Brokerage Services, LLC
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Reece v. Wootten et al
as 3:2014cv01403
Plaintiff:
James R. Reece
Defendant:
John D Wootten, Jr., Tom E. Gray, Henry Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
