Cases 11 - 20 of 238
USA v. Anderson
as 23-50837
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan David Anderson
USA v. Anderson
as 23-50834
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jonathan David Anderson
David v. Friedman et al
as 1:2023cv08364
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David
Defendant:
Gary Friedman and Friedman Law Group LLP
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Fuller v. Madson et al
as 0:2023cv03467
Plaintiff:
Jonathan-David Fuller
Defendant:
Deanna-Fay Madson, Jessie Behrhorst and State of Minnesota Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Jonathan Grenon, et al
as 23-13478
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN DAVID GRENON, JORDAN PAUL GRENON and JOSEPH TIMOTHY GRENON
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
KRENTZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv10479
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DAVID KRENTZ
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CARTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DAVID CARTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BUNDRICK v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21907
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DAVID BUNDRICK
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ALEXANDER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv21633
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN DAVID ALEXANDER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woodroff v. Smith et al
as 6:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
Jonathan David Woodroff
Defendant:
Shannon Smith, Adam Good, Steve Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
