Cases 11 - 20 of 32
ACOSTA III v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv68143
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH VICTOR ACOSTA III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Davis
as 5:2019cv00468
Petitioner:
Joseph Victor Martinez
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joseph Victor Lagana v. People of the State of California et al
as 2:2019cv01360
Petitioner:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Respondent:
Ian Parkinson and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lagana v. People of the State of California et al
as 3:2019cv00786
Respondent:
Sheriff Ian Parkinson and People of the State of California
Petitioner:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lagana v. State of California et al
as 4:2019cv00455
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco, Starbucks Corporation, State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Victor Lagana v. State of California et al
as 2:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Defendant:
Ian S. Parkinson, City and County of San Luis Obispo, Unknown Deputies and Officers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Waters v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2018cv00188
Plaintiff:
Joseph Victor Waters
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Bryant v. Puhl et al
as 1:2016cv03712
Plaintiff:
Hattie Mae Bryant
Defendant:
Todd Puhl, Pamela Monroe, Mark Richts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagana v. San Mateo County Sheriff et al
as 4:2015cv04696
Plaintiff:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Defendant:
San Mateo County Sheriff, Daly City Police Department, San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lagana v. Greg Munks
as 3:2015cv04047
Petitioner:
Joseph Victor Lagana
Respondent:
Greg Munks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
