Cases
Cases 11 - 18 of 18
Garrett v. Sholl et al
as 6:2018cv01425
Defendant: Jason Sams, Michael Nielson, Judge Barkett and others
Plaintiff: Tracy Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp et al v. 74 Eldert Funding Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv02491
Defendant: 74 Eldert Funding I, Inc., 74 Eldert Funding Inc., 74 Eldert LLC and others
Plaintiff: Cie Sharp and Michael Sharp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00221
Plaintiff: Robert E. Zorn
Defendant: The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zorn v. The State of Vermont et al
as 1:2011cv00985
Plaintiff: Robert E. Zorn
Defendant: The State of Vermont, The United States of America, Vermont State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aiken v. Bidmon et al
as 3:2011cv00060
Plaintiff: Warren Aiken, Jr.
Defendant: Judge Martin J. Bidmon and FNU Chipwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ceparano v. Suffolk County, NY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02030
Defendant: P.O. "John Doe's #'s 10-50", "Supervisor of Bradford S. Magill", "Supervisor of Patricia Brosco" and others
Plaintiff: Anthony J. Ceparano
MADD: Mother's Against Drunk Driving
Peeping Pervert: Cathy Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ja-Ron Teague, et al v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 08-5552
Plaintiff: CEDRIC GRADY
Plaintiff - Appellant: JA-RON S. TEAGUE
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, LOUISVILLE METRO GOVERNMENT, MAYOR JERRY ABRAMSON and others
Martin v. Kittles et al
as 0:2007cv02953
Plaintiff: Clarence Martin
Defendant: Dale Kittles, Charles Grose, Jr and Judge Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?