Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Frederick Rolle v. USA, et al
as 10-2055
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID G. LARIMER, MARION W. PAYSON and others
Roylon Green v. J. L. Smith
as 10-6368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROYLON A. GREEN
Defendant - Appellee:
J. L. SMITH, D. R. STEPHENS, K. M. WHITE and others
NELSON v. WILLIAMS et al
as 1:2010cv00245
Plaintiff:
CALVIN B. NELSON
Defendant:
TYRONE WILLIAMS, EDWARD F. RIELLY, ISACC FULWOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Husband v. Watts et al
as 2:2010cv00004
Plaintiff:
Eunice Husband
Defendant:
Harrell Watts, K. M. White, Joe D. Driver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Marshall v. Lappin et al
as 2:2010cv00003
Plaintiff:
La'Ron Marshall
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, K. M. White, James Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Steven Cupp v. Duane Brown
as 09-8214
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN CUPP
Defendant - Appellee:
DUANE BROWN, Record Office Staff, CECIL NICHOLS, JOYCE FRANCIS, Warden and others
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Lappin et al
as 09-7957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HAROLD WATTS, B. A. BLEDSOE and others
Solan v. Rice et al
as 3:2009cv00643
Plaintiff:
David Solan
Defendant:
Benjamin Rice, John/Jane Doe 1, Patricia R. Stansberry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question Bivens-Prisoner
Wise v. White et al
as 2:2009cv00467
Plaintiff:
Eric Wise
Defendant:
K. M. White, Patricia Stansberry, Alvin Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKS v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01516
Petitioner:
DARRELL J. PARKS
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, K. M. WHITE, JOHN DOE, 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
