Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 117
Budram v. Kalamazoo County et al
as 1:2023cv00620
Plaintiff: Michael Budram
Defendant: Kalamazoo County, Thomas Whitner, Cynthia Gill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1471
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Defendant: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated
Appellant: VISSER AND ASSOCIATES, PLLC, DONALD RAY VISSER, DONOVAN VISSER and others
Defendant / Appellee: ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI, ANTRIM COUNTY, MI and others
Crossroads Mall Realty Holding, LLC v. Kalamazoo County Transportation Authority et al
as 1:2023cv00478
Plaintiff: Crossroads Mall Realty Holding, LLC
Defendant: Kalamazoo County Transportation Authority, Kalamazoo, County of, Portage, City of and others
Michael Carver v. City of Kalamazoo, MI, et al
as 23-1369
Plaintiff / Appellant: MICHAEL D. CARVER
Defendant / Appellee: MICHAEL STEIN, individually and in his official capacity, RUTH WESTFALL, individually and in her official capacity, CIERRA PATRICK, individually and in her official capacity and others
Wayside Church, et al v. Van Buren County, MI, et al
as 23-1339
Plaintiff / Appellee: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Intervenor: TAYLOR BEIGHTOL
Defendant / Appellee: VAN BUREN COUNTY, MI, in its individual Michigan municipal capacity and on behalf of a class of all other Michigan counties similarly situated, ALGER COUNTY, MI, ALLEGAN COUNTY, MI and others
In re: Frederick Grainger, Jr., et al
as 23-103
Petitioner: In re: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR., BRIAN BEHOVITZ, MINDY CALKINS and others
Respondent: WAYSIDE CHURCH, an Illinois Not-For-Profit (Ecclesiastical) Corporation, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, HENDERSON HODGENS, Van Buren County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated, JOHN G. RIECKMAN, Alger County, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated in each of the aforesaid counties and others
Fingal et al v. Ontonagon County et al
as 2:2023cv00061
Plaintiff: Daniel Fingal, Keith Kantor, Johanna McGee and others
Defendant: Ontonagon County, Michele Smith, Alger County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Frederick Grainger, Jr. v. Ottawa County, MI, et al
as 23-1230
Plaintiff: FREDERICK GRAINGER, JR.
Intervenor: BRIAN BEHOVITZ
Defendant / Appellee: OTTAWA COUNTY, MI, by its Board of Commissioners, AMANDA PRICE, in her individual and official capacity, BRADLEY SLAGH, in his individual capacity and others
Johnson v. Kalamazoo, County of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00138
Plaintiff: Joseph Johnson
Defendant: Kalamazoo, County of, Chantel Einhardt and Michelle Greenlee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaffer v. Gilman et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv01221
Plaintiff: Alonzo Shaffer
Defendant: Cody Gilman, Office of Administrator, Unknown Party and others
Interested Party: Michigan State Police
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?