Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Johnson v. Hudson
as 5:2020cv03193
Respondent:
D. Hudson
Petitioner:
Kareem Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05226
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. United States Of America
as 1:2018cv22225
Plaintiff:
Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv06146
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JOHNSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2016cv03937
Plaintiff:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00537
Plaintiff:
Brian Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho, LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, et al.
as ALM/2:15-cv-00070
Plaintiff:
Brian Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Johnson v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC, et al.
as 2:2015cv00070
Plaintiff:
Brian Kareem Johnson
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MILLER v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2014cv02052
Plaintiff:
JAHMIL MILLER
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, D.O.C. COUNTY JAIL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kareem Johnson v. Mary Canino, et al
as 12-1128
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KAREEM JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY CANINO and PA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, individually and in their official capacity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
