Cases 11 - 20 of 46
Clifford C. Loyer v. Sharon Petrosino et al
as 8:2019cv01788
Defendant:
Scott Kawamoto, Jorge Romero, Sandra Sosa and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford C. Loyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexsandr Czeslovski v. Cit of Torrance, et al
as 2:2019cv01758
Defendant:
Officer R Matsuno, Officer J Branley, Officer B Kawamoto and others
Plaintiff:
Aleksandr Czeslovski
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Kawamoto v. Doe et al
as 5:2018cv06718
Defendant:
Joseph M. Young and Steve Doe
Plaintiff:
Michael Kawamoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith et al v. Conway et al
as 1:2018cv00491
Plaintiff:
Maurice Kevin Smith and Smith Development, Inc.
Defendant:
Martin Conway and Pesner Kawamoto Conway, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
G4S Secure Integration LLC v. EX2 Technology LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04277
Plaintiff:
G4S Secure Intergration LLC
Defendant:
EX2 Technology LLC , Kyle Hildebrand , Misty Stine and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836
Kawamoto et al v. State Farm Lloyds et al
as 4:2016cv01126
Plaintiff:
Albert Kawamoto and Kathleen Kawamoto
Defendant:
State Farm Lloyds , Darrell Murphy and Walter Viermann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Mel Horner v. First Hawaiian Bank, et al
as 16-16388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEL D. HORNER
Defendant - Appellee:
FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK, MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRY SYSTEM, MORTGAGE SERVICE CENTER and others
Kawamoto et al v. Ige et al
as 1:2016cv00362
Plaintiff:
Noboru Kawamoto and Elaine Kawamoto
Defendant:
David Ige , Virginia Pressler , Rachel Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Horner v. First Hawaiian Bank et al
as 1:2016cv00122
Plaintiff:
Mel D. Horner
Defendant:
First Hawaiian Bank , Mortgage Electronic Registry System, Mortgage Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
