Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Gaddis v. Johnson et al
as 1:2021cv00567
Respondent:
Kelley Johnson and Sylacauga Police Department
Petitioner:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gaddis v. Woodrouf et al
as 1:2021cv00460
Defendant:
Kelley Johnson, Chad Woodrouf, Steven Giddens and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gaddis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramel v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2018cv03540
Defendant:
Kelley Johnson, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP, John Doe/Jane Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Ramel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ramel v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 1:2017cv05178
Plaintiff:
Marjorie Ramel
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP , Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. , Sheryl Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oden v. King et al
as 1:2017cv01724
Plaintiff:
Damon Eugene Oden
Defendant:
Julian M King, Kelley Johnson, Steven Dale Giddens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oden v. Johnson et al
as 1:2017cv00837
Plaintiff:
Damon Oden
Defendant:
Kelley Johnson and Jeb Fannin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC f/k/a Johnson and Johnson Pharmaceutical Research and Development, LLC et al
as 2:2016cv09508
Plaintiff:
Kelley Johnson and Deborah Law
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos, et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC, et al
as 2:2016cv06499
Plaintiff:
Henry Amos , James Andrysiak , Marjorie Beasley and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Colvin (previously Astrue)
as 2:2012cv03060
Plaintiff:
Kelley Johnson
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
