Cases 11 - 20 of 55
KING v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2021cv16263
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KING
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA LP, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP and others
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. State of N.C.
as 5:2021hc02130
Petitioner:
Kenneth King
Respondent:
State of N.C. and Drew Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv17471
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv98996
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv31807
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang v. King
as 20-719
Defendant:
Does 1-10, Lynn King and Joseph Shih-Fan King
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Andrew Wang, Shou-Kung Wang, individually and Shou-Kung Wang, derivatively on behalf of the Chi-Chuan Wang Revocable Trust
Defendant / Appellee:
Yien-Koo King, Kenneth King and Raymond F. King
Elliott v. Wayne County Prosecutor et al
as 2:2019cv12048
Defendant:
Betsey Sedore, Michael Hathaway, William Winters and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Elliott
Elliott v. Worthy et al
as 2:2019cv12049
Defendant:
Antonio Viviono, Betsey Sedore, Jefferey Knocke and others
Plaintiff:
Melvin Elliott
KING v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00703
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KING
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wang et al. v. King et al.
as 1:2018cv08948
Plaintiff:
Shou-Kung Wang and Andrew Wang
Defendant:
Kenneth King, Does 1 Through 10, Raymond King and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
