Cases 11 - 20 of 139
Kerr et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 2:2022cv04554
Plaintiff:
Travis Kerr and Cathrine Sincovish
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
KERR et al v. UNIQUE VACATIONS, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv03577
Plaintiff:
RONALD KERR and DOROTHY KERR
Defendant:
SANDALS RESORTS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED, UNIQUE VACATIONS, INC., UNIQUE VACATIONS, LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BURTON v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
NIARA BURTON
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN E. WETZEL, STATE COORDINATOR DAVID RADZIEWICZ, MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOSPH SILVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Kerr v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv00357
Plaintiff:
Kevin Kerr
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant:
JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv04914
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frick v. Spiess, et al
as 1:2021cv00959
Defendant:
Charles Rees Brown, Federal Bureau Investigation, Michael Newsome and others
Plaintiff:
John E. Frick
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kerr v. Sagan et al
as 3:2021cv00459
Plaintiff:
Ronald H Kerr
Defendant:
William Sagan and Sagan Trucking, LLC doing business as WLK TRUCKING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
J Morita MFG v. Dental Imaging Technologies
as 2:2021cv00663
Defendant:
Kavo Kerr Group and Dental Imaging Technologies
Plaintiff:
J Morita MFG
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
