Cases 11 - 20 of 692
White v. Hendricks
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kevin White
Defendant:
Joe Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Staples, Bey v. Parsons et al
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Don Juan Staples, Bey
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. Parsons, Sargent Kevin Allen, W. M. Tanzey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huffman v. Brown
as 3:2023cv00100
Petitioner:
Kevin Michael Huffman
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Farley v. Kijakazi
as 5:2023cv00305
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patrick Farley
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Abner v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
William Abner
Defendant:
The United States of America
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Michael Acord, Clark Blackburn, Shane Boggs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Carter v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00251
Plaintiff:
Kevin Carter
Defendant:
The United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Goodman v. Searls
as 2:2023cv00122
Petitioner:
Kevin Goodman, Jr.
Respondent:
Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bowman v. Lincoln County, West Virginia et al
as 2:2023cv00099
Plaintiff:
Kevin Dale Bowman
Defendant:
Lincoln County, West Virginia, Lincoln County, WV Sheriffs Office and Wexford Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hanna v. FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
as 5:2023cv00012
Petitioner:
Kevin W. Hanna
Respondent:
FCI Hazelton Warden Mrs. Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Brown v. Bias et al
as 2:2023cv00023
Plaintiff:
Anthony Scott Brown
Defendant:
Andrew Bias and Kevin Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
