Cases 11 - 20 of 230
Kevin Bjornson v. Equifax Information Services, LLC
as 23-35421
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN SCOTT BJORNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC
Kevin Griffith v. Dan White
as 23-35401
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEVIN SCOTT GRIFFITH
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN WHITE
WOLF v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv08708
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SCOTT WOLF
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Scott, Sr. et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
as 2:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott, Sr. and Lucretia Scott
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of Oregon
Interested Party:
Hurricane Ida Program Administrator
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
CMG HoldCo, LLC v. Violette
as 1:2023cv00427
Plaintiff:
CMG HoldCo, LLC
Defendant:
Kevin Scott Violette
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Derfert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00195
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Derfert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bjornson v. Equifax Information Services LLC
as 3:2023cv05128
Plaintiff:
Kevin Scott Bjornson
Defendant:
Equifax Information Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Kevin Karsjens v. Cal Ludeman, et al
as 23-1161
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Scott Karsjens
Defendant / Appellee:
Cal Ludeman, in their official & individual capacity, Lucinda Jesson, in their official & individual capacity, Tom Lundquist, in their official & individual capacity and others
Kevin Millen v. James Clark, et al
as 22-6000
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN SCOTT MILLEN
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES CLARK, Store Worker and DORIS CLARK
CHESNUT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv21322
Plaintiff:
KEVIN SCOTT CHESNUT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
