Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Hamilton v. Tristan et al
as 1:2011cv00788
Plaintiff:
George Hamilton
Defendant:
David Tristan, Edward Alameida, Thomas - Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cordova v. Dowling et al
as 1:2011cv01130
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Cordova
Defendant:
Ray Dowling, Ted Laurence, T. Singh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv08425
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Jackson et al v. Worcester Police Department et al
as 4:2010cv40132
Plaintiff:
Shane Jackson, Patrick Compere, Rogelio Tatis Mercado and others
Defendant:
Worcester Police Department, Thomas B Duffy, Gerald Montivedi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barton et al v. Vallejos et al
as 2:2010cv00181
Plaintiff:
Richard Gareth Barton, Richard Gareth Barton, Richard Barton Enterprises and others
Defendant:
Ted D. Vallejos, Tracy C. Vallejos, Mary M. Cordova and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Cordova-Lara v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv00124
Petitioner:
Christopher L Cordova-Lara
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons and NFN Chandler
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cordova-Lara v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
Christopher L Cordova-Lara
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons and NFN Chandler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Cordova-Lara v. Bureau Of Prisons et al
as 7:2008cv00118
Petitioner:
Christopher L Cordova-Lara
Respondent:
Bureau Of Prisons and Chandler
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jackson v. Houston et al
as 3:2007cv01108
Plaintiff:
Jimmie Lee Jackson
Defendant:
R M Houston, Cook, J C Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bunch, et al v. USPS, et al
as 2:2001cv00790
Plaintiff:
Catherine Bunch and Kari A Hatcher
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Shiela L Cordova
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
