Cases 11 - 20 of 6,205
Omnitek Partners, LLC v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 5:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Omnitek Partners, LLC
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Cochran et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 1:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Lockheed Martin Corporation v. Continental Casualty Company
as 8:2024cv00579
Plaintiff:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00546
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Donna DeMilt, et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
as 24-10416
Plaintiff:
DONNA DEMILT, ERIC RUTLEDGE, EMILIO SAN MARTIN and others
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION and UNIVERSAL CITY PROPERTY MANAGEMENT III, LLC
Ferguson et al v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 4:2024cv00025
Plaintiff:
Maria Del Carmen Gamboa Ferguson and United States of America
Defendant:
Lockheed Martin Corporation
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Michael Davis v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
as 24-10080
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DAVIS
Defendant:
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
