Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 108
LULAC Texas et al v. Esparza et al
as 1:2021cv00786
Plaintiff: Lulac Texas, Vote Latino, Texas Alliance for Retired Americans and others
Defendant: Jose Esparza, Ken Paxton, Jacquelyn Callanen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973
La Union Del Pueblo Entero, et al v. Gregory W. Abbott, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2021cv00844
Plaintiff: La Union Del Pueblo Entero, Friendship-West Baptist Church, The Anti-Defamation League Austin, Southwest, and Texoma and others
Consolidated Defendant: Isabel Longoria, Jacque Callanen, Yvonne Ramon and others
Defendant: Jose A. Esparza, Lupe C. Torres, Gregory W. Abbott and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Houston Justice, Houston Area Urban League, Delta Sigma Theta Sorority Inc. and others
Counter Defendant: Dana DeBeauvoir
Amicus Curiae: Foundation for Government Accountability, John R. Ashcroft, Young Black Lawyers' Organizing Coalition and others
Petitioner: Public Interest Legal Foundation, Harris County Republican Party, Dallas County Republican Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Texas State LULAC et al v. Elfant et al
as 1:2021cv00546
Defendant: Jacquelyn Callanen, Bruce Elfant, Isabel Longoria and others
Plaintiff: Texas State LULAC and Voto Latino
Petitioner: Lupe C. Torres, Terrie Pendley and Ken Paxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Republican National Committee et al v. Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01055
Plaintiff: Republican National Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and California Republican Party
Defendant: Alex Padilla and Gavin Newsom
Intervenor Defendant: Democratic Party of California, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Community Coalition and others
Amicus Curiae: Public Interest Legal Foundation, American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Issa et al v. Newsom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv01044
Plaintiff: Darrell Issa, Jerry Griffin, Michael Sienkiewicz and others
Defendant: Alex Padilla and Gavin Newsom
Amicus Curiae: American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California, American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California, Public Interest Legal Foundation and others
Intervenor: California LULAC
Intervenor Defendant: Democratic Party of California, Community Coalition, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
League of Untd Latin American, et al v. Edwards Aquifer Authority We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-50655
Plaintiff - Appellant: LEAGUE OF UNITED LATIN AMERICAN CITIZENS, (LULAC), MARIA MARTINEZ, JESSE ALANIZ, JR. and others
Defendant - Appellee: EDWARDS AQUIFER AUTHORITY
NAACP Houston Branch et al v. Capital One Bank, N.A.
as 4:2018cv00603
Plaintiff: NAACP Houston Branch , LULAC, Division VIII , Laurie Vignaud and others
Defendant: Capital One Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2015cv00219
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
512) 474-2697 (fax: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Veasey et al v. Perry et al
as 2:2014cv00246
Plaintiff: Marc Veasey , Jane Hamilton , Sergio DeLeon and others
Defendant: Rick Perry and John Steen
Respondent: United States of America , Texas League of Young Voters Education Fund, Texas State Conference of NAACP Branches and others
Movant: Colby Beuck
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Veasey et al v. Perry et al
as 2:2014cv00244
Plaintiff: Marc Veasey , Jane Hamilton , Sergio DeLeon and others
Defendant: Rick Perry and John Steen
Respondent: United States of America and Texas League of Young Voters Education Fund
Movant: Troy Fraser
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?