Cases 11 - 20 of 98
Edwards v. Valentine et al
as 3:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Morris Richard Edwards
Defendant:
Anna Valentine, Wellpath Health Care Services, Christina Lyons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadusky et al v. Homdamov et al
as 2:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Sam Sadusky and Opal Robbins
Defendant:
Fazliddin Homdamov, Progressive Preferred Insurance Company and Express Lane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Rollins v. Lane et al
as 4:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
James B. Rollins
Defendant:
Warden Tim Lane, Department of C, Quetin Gordon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lane v. Commissioner of SSA
as 6:2022cv00187
Plaintiff:
Patty J. Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mekus v. Adams et al
as 3:2022cv00045
Plaintiff:
Matthew Mekus
Defendant:
Mike Adams, Albert B. Chandler, III, Sherry Whitehouse and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Bensfield v. Murray et al
as 4:2021cv00104
Plaintiff:
Deborah Elizabeth Bensfield
Defendant:
Deputy Murray, Deputy Nard, Deputy Hocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lane v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00139
Plaintiff:
Kassie Jo Lane
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Nationwide General Insurance Company v. 1616 Gardiner Lane, Inc.
as 3:2020cv00651
Plaintiff:
Nationwide General Insurance Company
Defendant:
1616 Gardiner Lane, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Slider v. Lane
as 5:2020cv00343
Respondent:
Tim Lane
Petitioner:
Thomas J. Slider
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mason v. Allen et al
as 5:2020cv00124
Defendant:
Sargent Steven Meredith, Warden Timothy Lane and Officer Johnathan Allen
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Mason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
