Cases 11 - 20 of 23
Dennis Luther, Jr. v. John W. Stone Oil Distr L.L.C., et al
as 14-30891
Plaintiff - Appellee:
DENNIS LUTHER, JR.
Intervenor - Appellant:
LARRY CURTIS, A.P.L.C. and LAWRENCE NEIL CURTIS, also known as Larry Curtis
Curtis v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
as 4:2013cv00636
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis
Defendant:
Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Giudice v. Community Care Rigby, LLC et al
as 4:2013cv00130
Defendant:
Community Care Rigby, LLC , Larry Curtis and Rebekah Bird
Plaintiff:
Vincent Giudice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
United States v. Larry Tate
as 12-2744
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Larry Curtis Tate
ADAMS et al v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2010cv64287
Plaintiff:
JEAN CURTIS and LARRY CURTIS
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Larry Curtis Tate v. United States
as 09-3390
Petitioner - Appellant:
Larry Curtis Tate
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Tate v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2009cv01052
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Larry Curtis Tate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Type:
Prisoner Petitions
Curtis v. Master Protection Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv00166
Plaintiff:
Larry Curtis, Larry Curtis, Teresa Curtis and others
Defendant:
Master Protection Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
McCoy v. Gilchrest et al
as 3:2008cv00481
Plaintiff:
Michael C. McCoy
Defendant:
Joseph L. Gilchrest, James Ross, Samuel C. Dixon and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
United States of America v. Larry Curtis Waltz
as 2:2008cv00456
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larry Curtis Waltz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
