Cases 11 - 20 of 2,009
Torres v. North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division et al
as 1:2024cv00112
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Anthony Lee Torres
Defendant:
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Adult Division, Jeffery S. McGhee, Robert Brett Bullis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of NC et al
as 5:2024cv00100
Respondent:
NC Department of Adult Public Safety, State of NC, NC Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Marshall Lee Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. USA
as 5:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Ka Lee
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bailey v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00300
Plaintiff:
David Lee Bailey
Defendant:
United States of America
Rucker v. USA
as 5:2024cv00092
Petitioner:
Curtis Lee Rucker, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Horne v. Ishee
as 5:2024hc02065
Petitioner:
Calvin Lee Horne
Respondent:
Decretary T. Ishee and Secretary T. Ishee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCREE v. FLINT et al
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
ADAM LEE MCREE
Defendant:
CAPTAIN FLINT, SARGEANT WALLACE, OFFICER MABE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hanson v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03066
Plaintiff:
Rodger Hanson
Defendant:
Warden Talena Lee, Sergeant Randle, Unit Manager Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Andracchio v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Lee Anne Andracchio
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
