Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Lemons v. Southwestern Virginia Jail Authority
as 7:2019cv00748
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
Southwestern Virginia Jail Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lemons v. USA
as 7:2019cv81387
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Dejuan Lemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Chien v. Hauler et al
as 3:2019cv00235
Defendant:
Timothy J. Hauler, Donald W Lemons and Mark R Herring
Plaintiff:
Andrew Chien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kirschmann et al v. State Of Virginia et al
as 2:2018cv00600
Defendant:
Safiya Reynolds, Interim Justice Jane Marum Roush, Gail Heath Davidson and others
Plaintiff:
L.D.K., minor brought by next friend and parent, Rhonda Kirschmann and Rhonda Kirschmann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Gryder v. The Pointe at Stafford Apartments/Morgan Properties et al
as 1:2018cv01116
Defendant:
Stafford County Deputy "John Doe 4", The Fredericksburg, Va City Police Department, Deputies John Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Gryder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Simpson v. Supreme Court Of Virginia et al
as 3:2018cv00547
Defendant:
Supreme Court Of Virginia and Judge Donald W. Lemons
Plaintiff:
James Simpson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Bishop, et al
as 3:2018cv00263
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Defendant:
Mortrsh Disha, Michael Poerstel, Brook Pettit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grove v. Unknown
as 1:2018cv00431
Plaintiff:
Irvin Daniel Grove, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown, Dr. Rogers, Dr. Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Leiser et al v. Lemon
as 1:2018cv00349
Plaintiff:
Phillip B. Leiser, Esq. and Creative Legal Solutions, PLLC
Defendant:
Chief Justice Donald W. Lemon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simpson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2017cv00768
Plaintiff:
James Henry Simpson
Defendant:
Thomas B. Hoover, Melvin Todd, Jr., Joshua Boyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
