Cases 11 - 20 of 256
Torres v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv04258
Plaintiff:
Josue G Torres
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, Keechant L. Sewell, Amy J Litwin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company et al v. EU Medical Supplies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01852
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Liberty Insurance Corporation and others
Defendant:
EU Medical Supplies, Inc., Ely Uchitel, PAL Medical Supplies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
IN RE: LITHIUM ION BATTERIES ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 4:2013md02420
Plaintiff:
A-1 Computers Inc, Jason Ames, Automation Engineering, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Envtech, Inc. v. Litwin et al
as 3:2019cv00146
Plaintiff:
Envtech, Inc.
Defendant:
Wlodzimierz Jan Litwin
Interested Party:
Katarzyna Hyclak-Litwin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Envtech, Inc. v. Wlodzimierz Litwin
as 22-15864
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ENVTECH, INC.
Defendant / Appellant:
WLODZIMIERZ JAN LITWIN
LITWIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19227
Plaintiff:
JACOB ANDREW LITWIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KELLY EL v. LITWIN
as 2:2022cv02893
Plaintiff:
GENE P. KELLY EL
Defendant:
JUDGE LEANNE L. LITWIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Litwin v. Sievert et al
as 2:2021cv01599
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Defendant:
G. Michael Sievert, Timotheus Hottges, Marcelo Claure and others
Nominal Defendant:
T-Mobile USA Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Litwin v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv05365
Plaintiff:
Eugene Litwin
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Litwin v. Grubhub Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv04581
Defendant:
David Fisher, Keith Richman, Katrina Lake and others
Plaintiff:
Harold Litwin
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
