Cases 11 - 20 of 523
Mission Hen, LLC v. Lee, et al.
as 23-4220
Appellant:
MISSION HEN, LLC
Appellee:
JASON M. LEE, JANICE CHEN and AMRANE COHEN, Chapter 13 Trustee
Lee v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
Laryssa M. Lee
Defendant:
Olivia Smith, Legacy Ransom and Kendra Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Owners Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv02311
Plaintiff:
Jonathan M. Lee
Defendant:
Auto-Owners (Mutual) Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
LEE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05590
Plaintiff:
TERRELL M LEE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawson v. US
as 23-1971
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Dawson v. US
as 23-1927
Plaintiff:
JOE L. DAWSON, CONRAD C. COX, MARY R. COX, Trustees of the Conrad C. Cox Trust No. 1 and the Mary R. Cox Trust No. 1 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASON DIAL, TRAVIS DIAL, M. LEE JUENEMANN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Lee v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05422
Plaintiff:
Jeanette M Lee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
