Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Anthony Arceo v. Socorro Salinas, et al
as 20-16253
Defendant / Appellee:
R&R STAFF, CORONCR MOORE, DVI and others
Defendant:
MCHUGH, KONG, ADAMS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY A. ARCEO
Preet Singh v. APWU Oakland Local 78, et al
as 20-15782
Defendant / Appellee:
MARIA E. SOTO, YOLANDA BYRD, JAGMOHAN SINGH, "Tony" and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PREET M. SINGH
Singh v. American Postal Workers Union Oakland Local 78 et al
as 3:2019cv06659
Defendant:
Janet D. Morris, Frank J. Grimsley, Yolanda Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Preet M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
SMITH et al v. MB MUTUAL HOLDING COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv11297
Defendant:
MARK NEARY, ESQ., JAMES M. MANSER, KATHRYN SHABEL, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
LYNN Z. SMITH and BRIAN SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brisbin v. AB Staffing Solutions, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Kyle Brisbin
Defendant:
AB Staffing Solutions, LLC and Parmjit M. Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SINGH v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv06953
Plaintiff:
GLORIA M. SINGH
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Singh v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2017cv02211
Plaintiff:
Preet M. Singh
Defendant:
United States Postal Service , Jagmohan Singh, David Salcedo and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016at01325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv02543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ludlow v. Correctional Training Facility Medical Department et al
as 4:2016cv03974
Plaintiff:
Richard Edward Ludlow
Defendant:
Correctional Training Facility Medical Department, G. Palomero, Roselle Branch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
