Cases 11 - 20 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00752
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02061
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02045
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04217
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03686
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
DUNNS v. CASSABOON et al
as 1:2026cv07959
Plaintiff:
HOWARD L. DUNNS
Defendant:
WARDEN FLOYD CASSABOON, CUMBERLAND COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CAPTAIN AMY BRAG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2026cv12161
Plaintiff:
Pierre Cleveland
Defendant:
Detroit, City of, Michigan Humane Society, Desiree Curry and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Perea-Matos v. Blanche
as 26-4082
Petitioner:
BRENDA PEREA-MATOS
Respondent:
TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv02093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026xc02092
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
