Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Davis v. Gossnell et al
as 3:2019cv00689
Defendant:
FNU Byerly, Allen Cloninger, FNU Gossnell and others
Plaintiff:
Trey Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAXWELL v. USA
as 1:2019cv01163
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
MELVIN ANTONIO EUGENE MAXWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Michelson v. Miller et al
as 1:2019cv00311
Defendant:
Dustin Dow, FNU Maxwell and Quintin Miller
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lee Michelson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KADEL et al v. FOLWELL et al
as 1:2019cv00272
Plaintiff:
JASON FLECK, MICHAEL D. BUNTING, JR., MAXWELL KADEL and others
Defendant:
DEE JONES, NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHAPEL HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2019cv00013
Defendant:
SGT D. T. LENTZ, CITY OF WINSTON-SALEM, T. N. BRANCH and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCALLISTER v. WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00745
Defendant:
RICHARD GOTTLIEB, SGT D. T. LENTZ, ELISABETH FROST DRESEL and others
Plaintiff:
ANTON THURMAN MCALLISTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SOLSTAS LAB PARTNERS GROUP, LLC., V. MAXWELL, ET AL.
as 1:2015cv00346
Plaintiff:
SOLSTAS LAB PARTNERS GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
STEPHEN C. MAXWELL and JENNIFER L. TIPTON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carter v. Sullivan et al
as 3:2012cv00060
Plaintiff:
Audrey Carter
Defendant:
Greg Sullivan, Steve Hallett, Tera Teague Walters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MAXWELL v. REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC.
as 1:2010cv00918
Plaintiff:
RONNIE MAXWELL
Defendant:
REMINGTON ARMS COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
