Cases 11 - 20 of 175
Norman K. Young v. M. Grijalva et al
as 2:2022cv07155
Plaintiff:
Norman Keith Young
Defendant:
M. Grijalva, K. McQuaid, R. McClain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) McClain v. Scottini
as 2:2022cv01631
Plaintiff:
Jason McClain
Defendant:
C/O D. Scottini and D. Scottini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Scottini
as 5:2022cv05238
Plaintiff:
Jason McClain
Defendant:
C/O D. Scottini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharon Acosta et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05061
Plaintiff:
Sharon Acosta, Baron Allen, Andrew Anderer and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Cynthia McClain v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 5:2021cv02136
Plaintiff:
Cynthia McClain
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matthew McClain v. Fortis Capital II, LLC et al
as 5:2021cv01137
Plaintiff:
Matthew McClain
Defendant:
Fortis Capital II, LLC, NCB Management Services, Inc., ROES 1 through 75, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reynolds v. Madden et al
as 3:2021cv00955
Defendant:
E. Sanchez, Felix M. Vasquez, Raymond Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Haisani Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Justin Kojak v. Canoo Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02879
Defendant:
Canoo Inc., James F. ONeil III, Nicholas A. Petruska and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Kojak
Nakia Mcclain v. Andrew Saul
as 2:2021cv00322
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Nakia Mcclain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
