Cases 11 - 20 of 89
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Patterson v. Stirling et al
as 2:2022cv03183
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson
Defendant:
Brian Stirling, Charles Williams, John Palmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PATTERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14637
Plaintiff:
GARY MICHAEL PATTERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00772
Plaintiff:
Patterson, Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00772
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Ford v. Berman-Eisenberg
as 1:2022cv21498
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson Ford
Defendant:
Stephanie Berman-Eisenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Lang et al v. Washington County, Alabama et al
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Tony Gene Lang, Timothy Keith Williams, John Michael Taylor and others
Defendant:
Washington County, Alabama, Brad Johnston, William Beasley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
