Cases 11 - 20 of 21
EASLEY v. MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 5:2012cv00148
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO EASLEY
Defendant:
MACON POLICE DEPARTMENT , MACON GEORGIA , ANTOINE JORDAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
DUNN et al v. GUIDRY et al
as 5:2011cv00489
Plaintiff:
CHONDA DUNN , LORI DUNN and VALERIE KNIGHT
Defendant:
T GUIDRY , MACON GEORGIA , MIKE BURNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLLINS v. CITY OF MACON et al
as 5:2011cv00392
Plaintiff:
HARRY COLLINS
Defendant:
MACON GEORGIA , SHANE SMITH and MIKE BURNS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mark Handy v. Tina Cook, et al
as 11-14556
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARK HANDY
Defendant - Appellee:
TINA COOK, COOPER COOK, KENNETH CHAPMAN and others
Handy v. Cook et al
as 5:2010cv00271
Plaintiff:
Mark Handy
Defendant:
Tina Cook, Cooper Cook, Kenneth Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Burns et al
as 5:2010cv00113
Plaintiff:
Gregoire Mario Thomas
Defendant:
Mike Burns, Jerry Modena, Robert Reichert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ultimate Timing, LLC et al v. Simms et al
as 2:2009mc51455
Plaintiff:
Ultimate Timing, LLC and Arash Kia
Defendant:
David Simms and SA Innovations, LLC
Movant:
Mike Burns, Burns Computer Services, LLC and Germaine Simms
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Markel Insurance Company, Inc. v. Burns et al
as 6:2009cv00185
Plaintiff:
Markel Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Mike Burns, Shane Burns, Bill's Fish House, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Handy v. City of Macon et al
as 5:2008cv00425
Plaintiff:
Mark Handy
Defendant:
City of Macon, Mike Burns, Kenneth Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
