Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Ramos Funes v. Barr
as 19-2318
Respondent:
William P. Barr, United States Attorney General
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Ramos Funes, AKA Marcos Ramos
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Ramos-Tirado et al
as 3:2018cv01426
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Conjugal Partnership Ramos-Rivera, Marcos Ramos-Tirado and Diana Rivera-Torres
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramos v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 5:2017cv00200
Plaintiff:
Marco Ramos
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Mario Capmany
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAMOS v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01778
Plaintiff:
MARCO RAMOS
Defendant:
NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RAMOS v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01779
Plaintiff:
MARCO RAMOS
Defendant:
NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
RAMOS et al v. NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
as 2:2017cv01702
Plaintiff:
MARCO RAMOS , LORENZO ROQUE and RYAN BETHUNE
Defendant:
NAVMAR APPLIED SCIENCES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Esquivel v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2017cv00007
Plaintiff:
Evelio Aguilar Esquivel
Defendant:
Marcos Ramos, U.S. Customs and Border Protection and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Ramos Ortiz v. USA
as 3:2016cv02194
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Marcos Ramos Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramos v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv01761
Defendant:
Jane and John Doe, Police Officer Rodriguez and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Marcos Ramos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
USA v. Merlin Marcia-Acosta
as 13-10475
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MERLIN MARCIA-ACOSTA, AKA Marcos Ramos Garcia
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
