Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12363
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Universal Underwriters Ins Co. v. Winton, et al
as 15-6051
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNIVERSAL UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK DOOLEY, as co-personal representative of the estate of Rebekah Jane Burgess, deceased, TAMMY WINTON, individually and as representative of the estate of Brant Matthew Winton, deceased, MARCUS ALLEN MOORE and others
Defendant:
RAYMOND ROBERTS
Phoenix Insurance Company, et al v. Winton, et al
as 15-6052
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellee:
NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY OF PITTSBURGH, PA
Defendant - Appellant:
TAMMY WINTON, individually and as representative of the estate of Brant Matthew Winton, deceased, ALICE BURGESS, individually and as co-personal representatives of the estate of Rebekah Jane Burgess, deceased, PATRICK DOOLEY, as co-personal representative of the estate of Rebekah Jane Burgess, deceased and others
Defendant:
RAYMOND ROBERTS
:
Phoenix Insurance Company v. Winton et al
as 5:2014cv00095
Plaintiff:
Phoenix Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tammy Winton , Raymond Roberts, Alice Burgess and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Universal Underwriters Insurance Company v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv01215
Plaintiff:
Universal Underwriters Insurance Company
Defendant:
Raymond Roberts, Alice Burgess, Patrick Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Moore et al v. Southern Railway Company
as 7:1986dv00770
Plaintiff:
Roy M Moore and Marcus Roy Moore
Defendant:
Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moore v. United States of America
as 3:2009cv01039
Petitioner:
Marcus T Moore
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
