Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mims v. Marengo County et al
as 2:2010cv00125
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Mims
Defendant:
Marengo County, Marengo County Sheriff's Dept., Jesse R. Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hackworth v. Marengo County Jail et al
as 2:2008cv00125
Plaintiff:
Daryl La'Keith Hackworth
Defendant:
Marengo County Jail, Michelle Tate and Linda Lawson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Landrum v. State of Alabama et al
as 2:2006cv00001
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Landrum
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Marengo County District Attorney, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hackworth v. Marengo County Jail et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
Daryl La'Keith Hackworth
Defendant:
Marengo County Jail, Michelle Tate and Linda Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Marengo County Detention Center et al
as 1:2007cv00667
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Marengo County Detention Center and Otis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Marengo County Detention Center et al
as 2:2007cv00667
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore, Jr.
Defendant:
Marengo County Detention Center and Otis Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
