Cases 11 - 20 of 109
United States v. Reynoso
as 22-2119
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO REYNOSO, AKA Mario Hernandez
hernandez et al v. INSURANCE COMPANY
as 0:2022cv61975
Plaintiff:
Mario hernandez, Madelin Martell, Mario Gomez Hernandez and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
USA v. Mario Velazquez
as 22-5866
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO HERNANDEZ VELAZQUEZ
USA v. Mario Velazquez
as 22-5824
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO HERNANDEZ VELAZQUEZ
United States v. Reynoso
as 20-2130
Defendant / Appellant:
MARIO REYNOSO, AKA Mario Hernandez
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Brasil et al v. City of San Jose et al
as 5:2022cv03560
Plaintiff:
Raquel Brasil, Mario Hernandez, S.H. and others
Defendant:
City of San Jose, George Brown and Erik Brunner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Omar Rodriguez v. Kimberly Rivera, et al
as 21-12857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OMAR G. RODRIGUEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
KIMBERLY ANN RIVERA, ASA 84552 Florida Bar, State Attorneys Office, in official and individual capacities, ABBE SHEILA RIFKIN, ASA 355992Florida Bar,State Attorneys Office, in official and individual capacities and MARIO HERNANDEZ, Miami-Dade Police Officer, in official and individual capacities
Rodriguez v. Rivera et al
as 1:2021cv22261
Defendant:
Mario Hernandez, Abbe Rifkin, Kimberly Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
Omar G. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Hernandez
as 21-10709
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Mario Hernandez, Jr.
Gonzales v. Affin et al
as 4:2021cv01329
Plaintiff:
Timothy Elijah Gonzales
Defendant:
Officer Mario Hernandez and Sgt. Affin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
