Cases 11 - 20 of 30
James v. Berryhill
as 3:2018cv00004
Plaintiff:
Marvin James
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
James et al v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01569
Plaintiff:
Donna James and Marvin James
Defendant:
Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC , Seterus, Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Rhine v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv02853
Petitioner:
Marvin James Rhine
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JAMES v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03002
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JAMES
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Alvarez et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv01287
Plaintiff:
James Alvarez, Jr., Salvatore Ambrosiso, Andrew Anderson and others
Defendant:
John Does 1 through 3 and SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Alvarez et al v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation et al
as NYE/1:12-cv-01287
Plaintiff:
James Alvarez, Jr. , Salvatore Ambrosiso , Andrew Anderson and others
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation and John Does 1 through 3
McReynolds et al v. Lane
as 1:2012cv00097
Plaintiff:
Tom McReynolds , Black Mountain Outfitters, Inc. , Marvin James and others
Defendant:
Jim Lane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
USA v. Rondale Nelson
as 11-3302
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RONDALE NELSON, a/k/a MARVIN JAMES
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. The Falcons Sports Bar & Grille, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv02075
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
The Falcons Sports Bar & Grille, LLC and Marvin James
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 551
Marvin Hamilton v. USA
as 11-2270
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARVIN JAMES HAMILTON
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
