Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Steele v. Simmons et al
as 5:2007ct03068
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Z. Simmons, Joseph Lightsey, Guard Bosworth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William S Pass v. Marvin Polk
as 2:2007cv02645
Petitioner:
William S Pass
Respondent:
Marvin Polk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Steele v. Correll et al
as 5:2007ct03051
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Sgt. Correll, Sgt. Carr, Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steele v. Polk et al
as 5:2007ct03035
Plaintiff:
Trevon Steele
Defendant:
Marvin Polk, R. Wellman, Linda D. Langdon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thaggard v. Strickland et al
as 5:2007ct03033
Plaintiff:
James Thaggard
Defendant:
Lt. Strickland, Joseph Lightsey, R. Wellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefoot v. Polk et al
as 5:2007ct03029
Plaintiff:
Charles Robert Barefoot, Jr.
Defendant:
Marvin Polk, DCC Board, Chaplain Montgomery and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Vick et al
as 5:2007ct03020
Plaintiff:
Zane Johnson
Defendant:
Vick, James King, ., E. L. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Beck, et al
as 5:2007ct03006
Plaintiff:
James A. Campbell and James A. Campbell
Defendant:
Theodis Beck, Theodis Beck, Theodis Beck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Branker
as 06-29
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM ROBERT GRAY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina and GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Bowie v. Branker
as 06-25
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHAN WAYNE BOWIE
Respondent - Appellee:
MARVIN POLK, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina and GERALD J. BRANKER, Warden, Central Prison, Raleigh, North Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
