Cases 11 - 20 of 36
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01229
Plaintiff:
Rise, Inc., Black Voters Matter Fund, The New Georgia Project and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca Sullivan and others
Amicus Curiae:
Amicus Curiae
Petitioner:
Georgia Republican Party, Inc., The Republican National Committee and National Republican Senatorial Committee
Intervenor Defendant:
National Republican Congressional Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2021cv01259
Plaintiff:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, Lower Muskogee Creek Tribe, League of Women Voters of Georgia, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Georgia Republican Party, Inc., National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
Sixth District of the African Methodist Episcopal Church et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2021cv01284
Defendant:
Wandy Taylor, Tim McFalls, Rocky Raffle and others
Plaintiff:
Georgia Muslim Voter Project, Latino Community Fund of Georgia, Women Watch Afrika and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee, National Republican Senatorial Committee, National Republican Congressional Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 52 U.S.C. § 10301
The New Georgia Project et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv01986
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, John Mangano, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Reagan Jennings, The New Georgia Project, Candace Woodall and others
Amicus Curiae:
Public Interest Legal Foundation and Landmark Legal Foundation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The Twelfth Congressional District Republican Committee et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv00180
Defendant:
Tim McFalls, Terence Dicks, Anh Lee and others
Plaintiff:
The Twelfth Congressional District Republican Committee, Cathy A. Latham, Edward T. Metz and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP, DSCC, Georgia Coalition for the Peoples Agenda, Inc. (GCPA) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pearson et al v. Kemp et al
as 1:2020cv04809
Defendant:
Anh Le, Matthew Mashburn, Brad Raffensperger and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Jay Van Gundy, Coreco Jaqan Pearson, Cathleen Alston Latham and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC, DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Intervenor:
Alice O'Lenick, Stephen Day, Ben Satterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv05018
Plaintiff:
National Republican Senatorial Committee, Perdue for Senate, Georgia Republican Party, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc., DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia
Amicus Curiae:
Georgia State Conference of the NAACP and Georgia Coalition for the Peoples' Agenda, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv04651
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
L. Lin Wood, Jr.
Intervenor Defendant:
DCCC, James Woodall, Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 1:2020cv05155
Defendant:
Anh Le, Brad Raffensperger, Rebecca N. Sullivan and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc. and DSCC
Plaintiff:
L. Lin Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Georgia Republican Party, Inc. et al v. Raffensperger et al
as 2:2020cv00135
Defendant:
Thomas Mahoney, III, Tommy Clark, David J. Worley and others
Plaintiff:
Perdue For Senate, National Republican Senatorial Committee, Jean M. Seaver and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DSCC and Democratic Party of Georgia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
