Cases 11 - 20 of 80
MCKAY v. ABAZA
as 2:2018cv05616
Plaintiff:
MARK MCKAY
Defendant:
SHARIF N. ABAZA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKAY v. KIMPTON HOTEL AND RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
as 2:2018cv02625
Plaintiff:
ALLISON MCKAY
Defendant:
KIMPTON HOTEL AND RESTAURANT GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCKAY v. GIBBONS et al
as 2:2018cv02112
Plaintiff:
MARK MCKAY
Defendant:
TED KRIMMEL, BRIAN HESSENTHALER, CHRISTOPHER GRAYO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02238
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carroll v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 3:2017cv02170
Plaintiff:
Wesley Carroll
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, Edward Burke, John Talaber and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKAY v. THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03042
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY MCKAY
Defendant:
THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. and VERED COSMETIQUE, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCKAY et al v. MCKAY et al
as 2:2016cv00569
Plaintiff:
DANIELLE MCKAY and BRIDGET A. HENSEL
Defendant:
ANTHONY MCKAY, DAVID SISAK , PETER BECHTOLD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv02062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MCKAY et al v. FOGEL et al
as 2:2015cv04755
Plaintiff:
ELISA MCKAY and EDWARD MCKAY
Defendant:
EMILY M. FOGEL and ROBERT FOGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BOBBERT v. MCKAY et al
as 1:2015cv00105
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM L. BOBBERT
Defendant:
JEFFERY MCKAY, DEAN SLICER, LAURA EATON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
