Cases 11 - 20 of 1,098
Medrano Hernandez v. Garland
as 24-3022
Petitioner:
JHUSTHYN KUEL MEDRANO HERNANDEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Medrano Robayo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2993
Petitioner:
JOHN HERMES MEDRANO ROBAYO, YUDY CAROLINA HERNANDEZ PARRA, DAN JEREMY MEDRANO HERNANDEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Westfield Insurance Company v. Bozza et al
as 1:2024cv03596
Plaintiff:
Westfield Insurance Company
Defendant:
Gary Bozza and Jose Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Escamilla v. Judge Medrano
as 3:2024cv00149
Petitioner:
Jorge Melenudo Escamilla
Respondent:
Judge Medrano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guy v. City of Corpus Christi et al
as 2:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Walter Kevin Guy
Defendant:
City of Corpus Christi, Julianna Siracusa Rivera, Matthew Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Elvis Medrano v. Brandon Garland, et al
as 24-1692
Plaintiff:
ELVIS C. MEDRANO
Defendant:
BRANDON GARLAND, KANE WAGGONER, GREG DIETCH and others
Biel et al v. Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC et al
as 7:2024cv02979
Plaintiff:
Miguel F. Biel and Doris Divina Medrano
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Transportation, LLC, Walmart, Inc. and Kofi S. Agbotse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
Medrano et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01036
Plaintiff:
Norma M. Medrano and Victor Medrano
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01118
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Medrano et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
as 7:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Julian Medrano and Maricela Medrano
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
