Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area et al
as 3:2019cv03441
Defendant:
Mount Diablo Unified School District/Special Education Local Plan Area, Leigh Law Group, Damien Berkes Troutman and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wilson v. Jones et al
as 2:2019cv00249
Defendant:
Earl Helfrich, G. Davis, Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Wilson v. County of Sacramento et al
as 2:2018cv02427
Defendant:
Sacramento Sheriff's Department, County of Sacramento, Rio Cosumnes Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Mount Diablo Unified School District et al
as 3:2018cv03973
Defendant:
Christopher Joseph Holleran, Brian Lawrence, Derek H. Murdock and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Wilson v. Grounds
as 5:2015cv03805
Petitioner:
Michael D. Wilson
Respondent:
R. Grounds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 5:2014cv04844
Petitioner:
Michael Geary Wilson
Respondent:
Superior Court of California for the County of Contra Costa and Barry P. Goode
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Florida Department of Revenue et al
as 3:2014cv04726
Defendant:
Brian Earl Watson, Jessica Elizabeth Buss, Adan Cardenas, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Eugene Wilson, Jr. v. Shaw
as 1:2014cv01494
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Shaw
as 3:2014cv03975
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Wilson, Jr.
Defendant:
Shaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. County of Contra Costa et al
as 3:2014cv03491
Defendant:
County of Contra Costa, Kelly Wayne Challand, Chad MacDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Geary Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
