Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Garver v. State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2015cv03017
Respondent:
District Court Stanton County, Nebraska and State of Nebraska
Petitioner:
Michael D. Garver
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carper v. Carper
as 8:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
Julie L. Carper
Defendant:
Michael D. Carper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. DCC-Douglas Co. Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Brenda, DCC-Douglas Co. Corrections, Michelle and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Exchange Bank v. Raasch et al
as 8:2012mc00065
Plaintiff:
Exchange Bank
Defendant:
Diane K. Raasch and Michael D. Raasch
Interested Party:
U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Fickler v. Astrue
as 8:2011cv00440
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Michaelle D. Fickler
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Hayes et al v. Heineman et al.
as 4:2011cv03229
Plaintiff:
Matthew Adams, Eric J. Aho, Jr., Cynthia Alberico and others
Defendant:
Carlos Castillo, Dave Heineman, Shane Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCroy v. USA
as 8:2011cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D. McCroy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Little et al v. Clark et al
as 4:2011cv03037
Defendant:
James R. Clark, DOES I through X, Thomas R. Ostdiek and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Little and David J. Pelkey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
United States of America v. Roemer et al
as 8:2008cv00265
Defendant:
Howard S. Roemer, Darlene A. Roemer, Ag Services of America and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
FIA Card Services v. Arbogast
as 4:2008mc03000
Plaintiff:
FIA Card Services
Defendant:
Michael D. Arbogast
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
