Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Ashton et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2018cv03959
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Castro, Angie Berberian, Rael Zaritsky and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Randall v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2019cv04132
Plaintiff:
Michael Randall
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Company, Bayer HealthCare LLC, Janssen Ortho LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 md
Ashton et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2017cv02162
Plaintiff:
Brenda Ashton , Nancy Balcom , Kenneth Barker and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anthony DeNoma v. John Kasich, et al
as 16-3839
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY DENOMA
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN R. KASICH, TED STRICKLAND, GARY C. MOHR, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) and others
Smith v. City of Oklahoma City, et al
as 16-6153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LAMONT SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, Criminal Court, A. J. LEWIS, BILL CITTY and others
Smith v. Oklahoma City City of et al
as 5:2016cv00555
Plaintiff:
Michael Lamont Smith
Defendant:
Oklahoma City City of, A J Lewis, Bill Citty and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warzek v. Fraueneim
as 4:2014cv01229
Petitioner:
Michael Randal Warzek
Respondent:
Scott Fraueneim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Michael Warzek v. Frank Chavez
as 13-16335
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RANDAL WARZEK
Respondent - Appellee:
FRANK X. CHAVEZ
Mark Kendall et al v. Popular Music LLC et al
as 5:2012cv01971
Plaintiff:
Audie Desbrow, Great White Entertainment Inc, Mark Kendall and others
Defendant:
Does, Popular Music LLC and Michael Randall
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
