Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Wilson v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2015cv01320
Plaintiff:
Michael S Wilson
Defendant:
Unknown Party and Big Muddy River Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Rensing et al
as 3:2015cv01249
Plaintiff:
Michael S Wilson
Defendant:
Patricia Rensing, Major D Cleland and Major R Hammonds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.B. Barge Co., Inc. v. Kudzu Marine, Inc., et al
as 15-10220
Plaintiff - Appellant:
M.B. BARGE CO., INC.
Defendant - Appellee:
KUDZU MARINE, INC., SPECIALTY FUELS, INC., SPECIALTY FUELS BTU, LLC and others
Michael Wilson v. Donald Gaetz, et al
as 14-2230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL S. WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
DONALD GAETZ, Ex-Warden-Chief Administration Officer and MICHELLE CREWS, Ex Law Librarian, Pinckneyville CC
Wilson v. Crews et al
as 3:2014cv00337
Plaintiff:
Michael S Wilson
Defendant:
Michelle Crews and Donald Gaetz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Gaetz et al
as 3:2014cv00071
Plaintiff:
Michael S Wilson
Defendant:
Donald Gaetz, Earl Wilson and S A Godinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. SAMSUNG SDI, CO., LTD. et al
as 3:2012cv06210
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Wilson
Defendant:
SAMSUNG SDI, CO., LTD., Samsung SDI America, Inc., LG Chem Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Wilson et al
as 3:2011cv00218
Plaintiff:
CitiMortgage, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael S Wilson, Jennifer Wilson, Southwest Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Bradford L. Picot, DDS et al v. Doctors Wilson & Wilson, PLLC, et al
as 3:2009cv00277
Plaintiff:
Bradford L. Picot DDS, PA and Bradford L. Picot, DDS
Defendant:
Doctors Wilson & Wilson, PLLC, Kelly B Wilson and Michael S Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Wilson v. Chrysler, LLC
as 2:2008cv00180
Plaintiff:
Michael S. Wilson
Defendant:
Chrysler, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
