Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Bagley v. Modern Woodmen of America et al
as 4:2018cv00088
Plaintiff:
Joann Bagley
Defendant:
Modern Woodmen of America , Mickey Shields, Racks LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Torrey v. MWA Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a Modern Woodmen of America
as 6:2017cv03398
Plaintiff:
Shirley Powell Torrey
Defendant:
MWA Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a Modern Woodmen of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Modern Woodmen of America v. Cason et al
as 1:2017cv00994
Defendant:
Devin Cason, Mitzie Cason and Ursula Hernandez-Cason
Plaintiff:
Modern Woodmen of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA v. AHOLD
as 5:2015cv00243
Plaintiff:
MODERN WOODMEN OF AMERICA
Defendant:
KONINKLIJKE AHOLD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sofge v. Modern Woodmen of America et al
as 1:2015cv00047
Plaintiff:
Marcie Sofge
Defendant:
Modern Woodmen of America and CoreSource, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Mitchell et al v. Modern Woodmen of America
as 3:2013mc00202
Plaintiff:
Tom J. Mitchell and Brittany Allred
Defendant:
Modern Woodmen of America
Movant:
Southern Farm Bureau Life Insurance Company
Bonds et al v. Modern Woodmen of America et al
as 3:2013cv00059
Plaintiff:
Larry R. Bonds , Thomas C. Morrison , Joyce P. Morrison and others
Defendant:
Modern Woodmen of America, W. Kenny Massey, George R. Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-4270
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07530
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Williams v. Modern Woodmen of America
as 3:2011cv03622
Plaintiff:
Christal Williams
Defendant:
Modern Woodmen of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
