Cases 11 - 20 of 1,309
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Murillo v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv20981
Plaintiff:
Jose Murillo
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Castellanos-Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1386
Petitioner:
ELVIN NAHUM CASTELLANOS-MURILLO and LEANDRO CASTELLANOS-FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Leslie Murillo v. Phillip Miller, et al
as 24-1442
Plaintiff:
Leslie C. Murillo
Defendant:
Phillip Miller, Sheriff, White County, White County, Arkansas and Jeff Everetts, Contracted Probation Officer
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Murillo v. Mule Creek State Prison
as 3:2024cv00935
Petitioner:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Respondent:
Mule Creek State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reyes Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-776
Petitioner:
ALAN REYES MURILLO, ANGELES REYES NU EZ, VILMA NUNEZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Laura Salgado Fuentes et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 2:2024cv01207
Plaintiff:
Laura Salgado Fuentes and Gabriel Gomez Murillo
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY and Does 1 through 50 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
USA v. Murillo-Angulo
as 24-20055
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Edward Erley Murillo-Angulo
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
