Cases 11 - 20 of 60
Selim et al v. Service Insurance Co et al
as 2:2022cv02086
Plaintiff:
Niazy Selim and Naima Selim
Defendant:
Service Insurance Co and Safeport Insurance Co
Special Master:
Patrick A Juneau, Jr and Cade Richard Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Principal Life Insurance Company v. Cook
as 7:2022cv04287
Plaintiff:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Naima J Cook
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 dj Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01413
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Stanton McCain, II v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-36007
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANTON HARRY MCCAIN II
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, NAIMA NEGHMOUCHE, DOC/TRU Officer, MICHELLE HENDERLING, DOC/TRU PREA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01716
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05664
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Stanton McCain, II v. Department of Corrections, et al
as 21-35737
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STANTON HARRY MCCAIN II, AKA Stanton H. McCain
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STEPHEN SINCLAIR, DOC Secretary, MICHELLE HENDERLING, DOC/TRU PREA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1447
Nasirova v. Synchrony Bank
as 1:2021cv11050
Plaintiff:
Naima Nasirova
Defendant:
Synchrony Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Smith v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2021cv00565
Defendant:
Steven Boston, Naima Chambers-Smith, Theresa Swart and others
Plaintiff:
Nathanial Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
